On Wednesday, January 9, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Crawford v. Marion County Elections Board. The case is about the constitutionality of Indiana’s law requiring voters to show government issued photo identification before casting their ballots. Crawford plaintiffs argue that Indiana’s strict photo identification requirements disenfranchise minorities and are unconstitutional. A federal appellate judge has written that the law likely burdens those “low on the income ladder.” Donna Massey, Project Vote Board Member and supporter of voting rights, issued this statement:
“With Crawford v. Marion County Elections Board, the Supreme Court has an opportunity to strike down a law that has no purpose other than to suppress the votes of minority and low-income Indianans. According to Census data, fewer than half of eligible minority and low-income Americans voted in 2006. Our democracy works best when all voters can easily register and voice their choice on Election Day. Americans have a right to vote, even if they don’t have a photo ID.
“Strict photo ID laws for voters are really about denying certain Americans of their right to vote. Research shows that young, poor, minority and elderly voters are more likely to lack photographic identification. A University of Washington study, for example, found that in Indiana 22 percent of African American voters lack proper identification compared to 16 percent of white voters. Twenty-one percent of voters earning less than $40,000 a year lack the necessary ID compared to just 13 percent of those earning more than $40,000. The only reason politicians support these laws is to give their party an advantage over the other.
“Requiring voters to show photo ID is just one of many hurdles partisans put up to make it more difficult for certain people to vote. Too many minority voters are met at their polling places with long lines, partisan challengers, faulty equipment and needlessly strict ID requirements. The right to vote has been under assault for the past eight years by partisans who put winning their interests above the right to vote.
“Strict photo ID laws are a solution in search of a problem. There is no evidence of widespread fraudulent voting in this country. Indiana even acknowledged that there hasn’t been a single case of voter impersonation in the state’s history. Americans take voting seriously and do not misrepresent themselves at the polls, so politicians shouldn’t misrepresent the facts to justify unnecessarily strict photo ID laws for voters.
“As the country’s premiere nonpartisan voter registration organization, Project Vote wants to make sure that the Americans we help register to vote can vote and have their votes counted on Election Day. Nothing should come between Americans and their right to vote.”